Ah yes, i remember this..

The male and the female, a shining artifact of the past. What a powerful little dialogue here, a woman telling a man he should love himself!

Yet this my freinds is a cautionary tale, if you think that 99% of the entire female population ANYWHERE on earth, but particularly in the west are like this, you are sorely mistaken. And the propensity for men to beleive that there exists his own private angelic warm and sirenic soulmate, is the cuase of much male suffering. Too often men ridicule and laugh at the knight in shining armor fantasies that women dream up... this desire for a man to come and sweep them off their feet, ride them off into the sunset... the desire to be rescued forever and ever

We laugh at these fantasies becuase we know that this fictional ethereal male archtype that women seem to have dreamed up, is very unlike the actual male human being, and his wants and desires, we laugh becuase thier veiw of the ideal male is so dramatically opposite to the reality in terms of how the male mind operates, that we see it as nothing more than wishfull thinking from an irrational female mind, an infantile need for a second daddy.

Except what you just saw is the male version of this fantasy, an affectionate accepting madonna filling the male void with kind words and agenuine connection, satiating the deep-seeded mother-need that rests within most men. thats what ive decided to call it... male-mother-need.

It is the male condition being one that displays variance down to our very chromosomal makeup, in the form the XY, that has imprisoned us in a constant make or break existence. Societies, and civilizations have benefitted well from an almost boundless male deductive capacity... the ability to see the unseen, is a hallmark of the male, and civilization as we know it demands it in a cold mechanical sort of way, constantly testing the limits of the totality of its men, and exerting incredible pressurres until the next male provides that next critical insight, that ushers forth a wellspring of change.

This pressure, while benefitting the civilizational group as a whole, exerts an incredible amount of pressure on men as a totality... and they are viewed as a totality. The individual male, his hopes his thoughts and dreams are irrelevant in the eyes of a society which views him as just another potential insight rich vein in the giant watershed moment mining operation.

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." Friedrich Nietzsche

The individual male that doesnt understand societies required indifference to individual male desire, he may very well seek solace, in the fantasy that there exist... somewhere ... a kind, caring exceptionally warm woman that willl demand of him, only what he demands of her, simple companionship and affection. therein lies the danger, this is what motivates men like MJ or Kobe bryant to pair up with one woman in marriage and take great financial risk in doing so. for all of our incredible powers of logical reasoning, we cant logically conclude, that women never did like us... for us. such an epiphany, would thrust the individual male into a darkness that has for eons terrified him. he is alone. and unless he does something useful nobody will see any intrinsic value in him. This raking clawing threat is compounded many times over in men of wealth and status like Michael jordan, his wealth and fame, compounds the need for a genuine connection with a single, and in his mind incorruptible female. Icredibly wealthy and emotionally needy men are the holy grail of the predatory western parasite after all.

"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation and go to the grave with the song still in them." Henry david thoreau

thats what were so scared of, were scared of the possibility that were only wanted in this society because of all the things we do to sustain it, we have a creeping suspision that in the event that a society could somehow build and sustain itself without the contributions of men, that its only a matter of time before that society would seek to expel its men.

so i introduce the term male civilizationale draw: and define it as a force chaaracteristic to all civilizations exerted onto the totality of its men as though an industrial resource, for the betterment of the men women and children, in the civilation but at the expense of only men, which is designed to maximize male innovation.


Rather than honestly looking at what appears to be a reality in which the totality of females view the totality of men as an unfeeling and untiring renewable resource, to be drawn upon, we place our faith in the female, or rather the individual female, who would never think to use us. this is why we as men tend to magnify even the most trivial acts of kindness from women as being proof positive... or rather disproof positive of the overall trend of female usury in regards to men

is my assessment wrong, my prognosis to grim? too much of an exaggeration? you do know that the majority of homeless are men, why?... for all the reasons i just gave you, because if single mothers where the majority of homeless youd see a society up in arms

we all know that there are women having children they cannot pay for because they know that welfare, and wic and food-stamps will pay their way, its no secret, the question... is why are these programs put into place?... its simple, we care when women are out on the streets, but when men are out on the streets, its somehow their fault accross the board regardless of individual circumstances because of civilizational male draw.

this is no plea for sympathy, just a wake up call, you can choose to look for your own private little paradise on earth in the form of a woman that most likely doesn't exist, or you can start to exert pressure onto society by refusing to feed it, stop being scared that you might not ever find the right woman, and start being scared, and then angry that society is using you on multiple fronts without consent. never in history men had the opportunity to truly understand themselves, our ientity has always been strained through a female filter first and then offered up to us condensed in a solution of chivalry and misandry but this is what im offering all of the men listening to this, a chance to contribute to a shift in male thought and attitude whether women and society want it or not,, taking such a path, does not involve swearing off women, it merely involves accepting something about their nature that will for the rest of your life, render you incapable of viewing them in the form that society has drawn them. this is what male sovereignty is, hatred f women? dont flatter yourselves, weve been indifferent for a long time now..... the questions and the answers to them are now being framed in such a way that it can be devoid of any female input. and the question must now be formed shaped, and eventually answered by men. what path will men take going into the future? This is your next watershed moment men, except this one has the otential to free men for good. many men say that the objectives delineated here are impossible, that men are biologically incapable of rendering themselves free of the influence women and society have over them. i say its not only possible, but necessary. we discovered and split the atom we can do anything we please.

your vote counts for nothing... "vote or die" morons please jump off a cliff

The american political process is devoid of any real choice... What i mean to say is that your vote, despite your being fed a seemingly never ending directive telling you otherwise in the days leading up to any major american election, your vote counts for nothing. The most important component of any accurate tally is of course its verifiability, yet not a single american has any irrefutable proof that his or her vote is ever even counted.

We pull a lever, we leave and we expect elected officials and a media machine run for profit by corporate and political interests, to tell us if our politicians are still elected. Its utter foolishness... When people tell you to vote they are telling you to suspend reality plain and simple. Its convenient for the average american to assume that their vote is tangible and real and valuable, and so we see a mass acceptance of an un-certifiable election process because the illusion of choice must never be tampered with, if they american prole is to continue his own demise.

There are football games to be watched after all. But we the american people have no real way of verifying any conclusive election result, and what most likely is the case is that there is an inaccuracy, and even a complete falsification and ignorance of any electoral process at the expense of the american voter, as one heads further and further out from the intimacy of local governance.

To imply that there is in fact unknown and unseen entities that truly are in control of american politics, is to be branded a nutjob lunatic in america. It is of course a knee-jerk reaction for any disenfranchised civilization to attack those who point out the writing on the wall, no matter how clear and legible it is. But im not going to rattle off, some speech about the rockefellers or the jews or whatever, because none of that can be conclusively proven,

True power when wielded correctly is almost always invisible. Im going to simply state, that the situation is very clearly one in which a robust media machine is functioning as a vast feeler apparatus designed to tacitly gauge the general public consensus, via polling, and creating the illusion of objectivity by introducing a controversial issue, and debating only a limited set of viewpoints. Conversation framing if you want to call it that...

The media functioning as this feeler apparatus is then of course required to have an intimate knowledge of public consensus... when enough pressure is exerted by the public, the trajectory of the political body will reflect that, its not the true wishes of the people but a manageable facade of what the people think that they want and need from their political intelligentsia.

If a war is needed, then the stupid american proles will be groomed for war, they will be asked... but really told their opinions of whether or not a diplomatic or military solution to the problem in whereverstan is favorable, counting on the fact that they will never ask themselves whether either is necessary in the first place. the average american is so out of touch with reality that any behavior, absolutely anything can be introduced, debated normalized and accepted within a period of a decade.

The sad state of american manhood, has been reduced to the beer swilling sex crazed sports acolyte, through this very process. The effeminate self hating vegetarian male heterophobe, as well the pseudo-christian red-blooded evangelical war mongering right winger are prototypes of the same kind of operant conditioning. Not a single original thought between either of them exists, and in fact every american cultural archetype arose through this culture/perspective assembly line, we have no sovereign consciousness.

Its no surprise that our political process has been, taken over completely, not co-opted, but completely commandeered, so as to be rendered useless... So dont tell me to go vote, and dont tell me to vote or die, i dont give a shit about a fake political process, i dont give a shit about mitt romney or newt gingrich or obama, or taking precious time out of my day to go pull a lever in a booth to convince myself that i have any control. I guess that since americans generally are aware that they are getting fucked over by the state, they at least demand a lever to pull to make them feel special and important, its very romantic, but a futile childish gesture devoid of any political potency. The real possibility for change lies in the swaying of minds, and the changing of perspective, since this political system is one that eschews exactitudes, all that is needed for a change in divorce and child support law, is the appearance of enough resistance to it, so that the powers that be run the risk of showing openly that the wishes of the public can be ignored. this is the political future that men must confront, one of generalities, where perception and reality are synonymous with one another.

Single mom psychology, seeks the spousification of male sons

This is why the wire is a masterpiece. I consider it to be arguably the best show of all time, and it displays unapologetically the catastrophic consequence, that matriarchy exerts onto adolescent men. The video above depicts Delonda, and her son Namond discussing how Namond intends to provide for her... the mother, now that Namond's father has received a life sentence in prison.

The psychology of the single mother, a derivative of the female psychology in general, is on full display here and it highlights a very important process by which the single mother subjects her male children to a process of spousification, that places the adolescent male in the position of stand in husband, with all of the obligations and responsibilities that this implies.

This stems from the propensity for women to view children as resources, that are linked to provision from the father. In the event that the father is no longer able to produce wealth, the next best thing, granted the woman still seeks to procure financial stability are the sons of the father. Male children in matriarchal up-bringings where poverty is rampant become the de-facto breadwinners providers and protectors to the mother.

It's an extension of female thought patterns that view men through a filter of greed and usury, and the adolescent male in the single mother household, becomes both the husband and the possession of the single mother.

This compels the single mother to continue a process of emasculation of the adolescent male, that she feels she could never complete with his father, and since the mother being an adult, has full control over whatever resources are coming into the home via the everyman... foodstamps and welfare and other predominantly male funded govt subsidies, she can weild this desire to own and mentally castrate her own male child with complete power and impunity.

The adolescent boy being the progeny of his father will undoubtedly and specifically as he approaches manhood, take on both physical and other heritable qualities of his father and the single mom will actually build resentment to her son for this, furthering her efforts to emasculate, control, and spousify him.


All this of course creates a profound rift in the adolescent male's development and it can manifest in various ways in him, One being the adolescent male taking on the persona of hyper masculine bravado, a desperate mad dash to project as much Pseudo masculinity as possible, and i explain this further in my video titled deconstructing PUA fruads.

In this scenario the adolescent male develops an extreme distrust for other men, because he fears that any strong male figure will betray him in the same way that his father has. What isnt usually discussed is just how he feels that his father betrayed him, the generic supposition being that feelings of abandonment cause him to feel betrayed, but the part that hurts him the most is the fact that he feels that his father didn't rescue him, from the manipulations and attacks leveled against him by his own mother.

The passage of time provides the male youth with more independence and physical strength as well as a desire to challenge authority, the mother inevitably loses control and throws the rebellious son out onto the streets, populated by other males that are just as wayward and confused as himself, along with all of the unresolved male hostility and abandonment issues, and what results is violence.. lots of it


Are my claims nothing but psychological conjecture? maybe, but the fact remains that young adolescent males in single mother households are more likely to commit crime, and more likely to join gangs, that they describe as their family, and their brothers, and more likely to shoot and kill other men from other gangs, so we see amongst these adolescent males a need for brotherhood and male bonding, as well as a need to attack men which they perceive as being hostile. We need to start asking ourselves, to what degree is the absence of fathers causing this behavior as opposed to the degree that the presence of single mothers are causing it.

Thats right the presence of single mothers, lets start analyzing that for a change. lets start asking ourselves why, wherever we see single motherhood we see male on male violence, we see poverty, we see despair, why should we be handing out wick and food-stamps and welfare to single mother's when everything points to them being the problem and not the victims of it.

We see our society with all its talk about a war on poverty and urban renewal, and president obama blaming the fathers... on fathers day nonetheless, all in hopes of hiding the fact that single mothers are the ones in direct control of male youth in the matriarchal settings, they are the heads of these so called urban renewal projects, they are the ones raising these so called deadbeat fathers.

It is them that have held a generation of young men under siege, and our society loves to label them thugs and criminals an warehouse them in jail-cells like animals, but the truth is that single motherhood is the problem, not these men... these men would flourish, given the correct opportunities, but as long as single mothers are treated with empathy, sympathy and even praise our society, you can expect to be treated to the pleasure of higher crime and poverty rates, with no solution in sight.

Kobe to divorce: feminist divorce industry claims its next goliath

What not to do? ^^^ this

The feminist divorce industry has poached another 12 pointer, this time Kobe Bryant. But honestly i cant say i feel sorry for him. lets review the facts.

- Kobe bryant is a millionaire NBA star

- He decided to get hitched to a video ho

-California law requires a marriage of 10 years in order for a woman to be eligible for alimony

-Kobe's wife is divorcing him after 10 years

Do the math. It seems that even the most successful men still have a infantile need to live happily ever after with that one special lady!

Only that special lady is just another instinctively feminist, greedy western skank, biding her time for the big payout.


Just observe the body language, her face tells it all... such is the countenance of a parasitic predator, observing every expression of her husband's, host's face probing for any resistance to the sex-anesthesia she has secreted into him over the years. The reactionary cunt probably had the divorce planned out before the marriage even occured.


Enjoy kobe hopefully the pussy was worth it.

Flawed male desire leads to traditional parasitism

I'd like to talk about what exactly commensurate compensation means. Commensurate meaning that if I as an employee or a business owner provide a service, then I expect to be compensated to a degree that is commensurate with the value of that service. The reason I say this is because certain women that come on my channel seem to have a predilection for telling me, that they are "good" women to their husbands...

Not resembling feminists and their constant demands for female privilege. And so I would like to appraise the services these benevolent women offer to their husbands in hopes of determining just how important the alleviations you offer are to your men in terms of burden relief. So a lot of it boils down to a simple exchange of sex for resources.

Ok is that commensurate? Well each man can decide that on his own but that still leaves us with the question to be answered in the general sense. Is your sexual recompense such that it alleviates all if the pressures and stresses exerted on your husband?

In physics we study force; the laws of physics state that when no net force is exerted on an object then the object is in a state of rest. Meaning that if one force is exerting more force than another, it is not at rest. With that said is your sex counteracting the force exerted on you husband such that the forces exerted on to him by his 70 hour work week are negated?

If they aren't then you, and the sex you dole out are an inadequate recompense for his efforts.

We want solely for the interests of men to find out whether or not the traditional wife provides enough bang for her buck, in the hopes of furthering the interests of the men listening to this and if we arrive at the conclusion that your sex is not commensurate then we will, regardless of what traditional homemakers have to say about it, pressure more and more men to do away with their desire to provide for a woman.

So we ask then who gets the better deal? the one giving out the sex, or the one working to support the one giving it out in hopes of continued access to it?

If sex was adequate compensation then why do men die earlier? These good women would have us think that they're doing their part. Yet it's funny because every time I see a husband and wife out in public one seems to be aging less, with this relaxed smug look on thief faces, almost as if they know they're getting away with with a better part of the deal.

Weve all seen these walking vestiges of masculinity with the wife and kids in some walgreens pharmacy on the weekend looking dead behind the eyes... resigned to his fate, and to you generic american husband i feel nothing but pity...

its pitiful to see you drag your dried out exoskeletons wherever the misses leads you, wondering why the weekends pass by so fast, and why the workweeks last so long and why you never get to see your kids, and why your too tired to see them anyway, and never once do you ask yourself why that suburbanite prostitute passing for your wife doesn't get off her lazy ass and start helping you out.

well because the sex, only you get it less and less now dont you? only even if you were still getting it as often your still slated to die earlier because you... and this is the part where you should listen and listen good... you are not receiving commensurate exchange.


you see we men have been told that this is a division of labor and indeed it is, thats exactly what it is... a categorically unfair division of labor. The loving traditional wife wouldn't be so loving if she was the one pulling a 70 hour work week, and what then would your loving traditional wife say when you attempt to pay her in sex

That form of payment is good enough for her to pay you with but not good enough for her to work for and receive as payment.

So what's the point? To encourage less and less men to participate in western traditional marriage, and to show that traditional marriage came out of a reality that simply does not exist anymore, and most importantly, women that claim to want traditional relationships consisting of turning dials on washing machines and dishwashers and doling out sex while you go out and bust your ass to support her, are deceptive, and selfish parasites that are perfectly fine with letting you slowly degrade your own male vitality and health to make things easier for her...


Men have been conditioned to think that they are worthless which is why we are so obsessed with proving our worth to women. We have to earn our way out of worthlessness which is why most men don't give a damn that the vast majority of homeless are the same gender as them, men are worthless, and you with your job and your mortgage and your responsibilities, you my friend are just a little less worthless than that male bum on the street, aren't you.. That mentality is what gets us into trouble.

women are paying us with the counterfeit currency of sex, and to be honest, most men arent even paying for just sex they are paying for some skewed form of motherly companionship. Many men secretly fantasize about some kind of constant motherly female affection is my best guess from what ive observed. Its far from just sex, we have a weakness within ourselves that desires female affection.

We as men have a bad habit of imagining the ideal women as being kind, inviting and warm, and someone that we can show our weakness to, but the reality is that women simply hate weak men. Its the cold hard reality that men need to face and address, you will find no solace in the bosom of a woman i assure you.

No you see it is time for men to stand up and look around them and see that it is a very cold place, and you are the only one that can pull yourself up out of this frigid abyss...you. There is no mommy coming to save you men, there is no mommy to make you feel safe, and as a matter of fact women despise men that show any weakness, because they want to be taken care of.

Thats right they despise you for wanting the same things that they demand from men. security protection reassurance etc. these things a man must earn, by overcoming insecurity, and danger in order to earn self assurance which women respond to... But it still boils down to one fundamental truth. men you are alone, in the eyes of this society and the only ones that will be rewarded are the ones that perform, and perform well according to this societies standards.

if you think for a second that in this society your inherent personhood matters as a man, you are sorely mistaken. This society just does not care. There exists a very real power however in knowing exactly where one stands, no matter how desolate and isolated your situation is.

If we know we are alone, then its possible that men just might for once in history find it mutually benefecial to help each other out for a change, to stop crawling over each other to get to the top and start asking ourselves why is it the we always seem to start at the bottom while the other half of the human race gets a leg up in every conceivable way from the state, and from our culture in general? Why are we made to compete with each other, to tear each other apart and hate each other, in order to gain acceptance from the very people that hate men for being at the top, and hate them even more for being on the bottom of the societal ladder.

Our main weakness as men lies within our inability to recognize when and how men are hated, we want so desperately to believe the illusion, we want so desperately to be liked and wanted and needed, that we have lost all sort of instinct for self preservation, to the point where we will literally jump in front of knives and bullets for women we dont even know. The system is not designed for male contentedness, it doesn't want male happiness, it wants you to constantly feel incomplete, it thrives off of your insecurity , it needs you to question yourself, it needs you to be in constant fear... Of what exactly? of being alone of being a virgin, of continuing to have sex after your no longer a version, of being muscular, of not going bald, of this of that of everything. Because remember you are not allowed a shred of weakness or vulnerability, it stifles the spirit of men it is pesticide on the male soul, and i want out. I want out...go ahead, repeat it for yourself, see how it makes you feel to say it... I want out. say it my fellow men we want out. there is real value in saying this because society still has no clue, their pumping out these man up articles one right after another arent they? have we raised a generation of men that dont know how to be men? where have all the good men gone? how come women are outperforming men in this and that?, they simply will not come admit that this is a result of a sustained effort to disenfranchise men, one in which the end result can only be, men turning their backs on a society that will to the bitter end hate on men for doing so. Becuase you exist to serve, there wont be an equal treatment of male victims of domestic violence, for example no matter how much the inequality of it is pointed out, simply because you as a man have no right in this society to demand equal treatment.

Such a thing would spell death for this society, and so to demand equality from this society is to demand that this society voluntarily carry out a process of self implosion. I certainly wont say that men shouldn't fight for these things. They most certainly should.. im simply making the claim that our society...western society as we know it, cannot exist, in the event that men begin to enjoy equal protections under the law fully.

And so my conclusion is simple, men must understand the following statements

First

Traditionalism is no longer functional in a society where technology has progressed to a point where it has cut the net working time of a homemaker in half, and the women that are sticking to traditionalism, are merely enjoying a free ride at the expense of you the provider workhorse, and they know it. Its about time you take note of it also.

Second

Women do not like men for their inherent personhood, they like what you can give them, once you arent giving it to them, whether it be excitement, or sex that they enjoy, or money then you are simply a non entity to them. Meaning that women have no conceptualization of masculinity outside the scope, of how they can benefit from it. And so they see it as nothing more than a transactional mechanism... a slot machine in which they have thanks to biology, a very good idea of when and how to pull the levers in order to hit the jackpot. See the excerpt on briffualts law in the description box in regards to this. Also even when you are providing to women what they want, they are always testing you to see if your still man enough to provide it, and in the period of time that you still are man enough, they on some level resent you for being able to do so, see also my video sharon Osbourne demonstrates innate female misandry in the description box.

Third
there is a very real power and strength to be extracted from the modern western male admitting to himself, hat he can and will experience vulnerability, and moments of weakness, just like women get to. This is not quote “getting in touch with your feminine side” and that very axiom proves my point, that any expression of vulnerability is associated with the female... meaning that if men show any vulnerability, then they are exhibiting female behavior, its just anther way of shaming men to take the bullshit that women never have to endure. Men will not truly understand their strengths until they are allowed to explore their weaknesses, and its time we wrestle away the the monopoly that women have on vulnerability. Yes men have historically been pillars of strength, but even atlas shrugged, and you will to many times I assure you. And so along with male sovereignty I want to introduce the concept of male vulnerability, in hopes that men begin to define it as an concept that is independent of all things feminine and is uniquely male,

Finally, to make it clear as I have numerous times in previous videos. These videos are being posted, as a resource for men. More specifically MRA/MGTOW minded men. I do not care about female input, although I allow them to watch. If women have something to say, in the comments section, please make sure that you keep it relevant to mra/mgtow topics. The time for debating women has passed a long time ago. If you want to debate the merits of the mens movement, go do it over at feministing