Heterosexual Suicide Serially Ignored In Misandric West

I want to start by saying that im fully aware that family guy is known for its controversial humor. And this video does not in any way advocate for the censorship of the show in any capacity. In fact I think its important that shows such as this are allowed to push the envelope of what appropriate and inappropriate humor. I say this out of a basic desire for the maintenance of free speech rights, but more importantly in this case…. I say it because it allows us to gauge certain standards of humor, specifically the boundaries that a society erects in the form of inappropriate and appropriate humor in hopes of minimizing the amount of humor that can be derived from another human being's suffering.

In every society there exists a fine line between humor and an insensitive attempt at it, and each individual society has different tolerance levels for just how much humor can be derived from the suffering of a specific group. In this case we have the heterosexual divorced male, and what this scene tells us is that it is in fact OK to ridicule heterosexual male suicide and in a way that graphically depicts the actual suicide taking place. Even in an animated media format, with a show known for controversial humor, I simply do not think that in this PC climate, and especially with the recent suicides involving female and homosexual high school youth… I don’t think for a second that family guy would depict, these scenario's, the actual act of suicide for any of these two groups.

I believe that society would deem it insensitive and cruel, I believe that a humor boundary has been erected within our society in terms of gay suicide, and I also believe that no complementary precautions exist for heterosexual male suicide. Specifically when dealing with the issue of suicide prompted by divorce, homelessness, and post traumatic stress disorder. The question is why?

The lack of empathy towards male suicide is a function of female entitlement, in its purest form. That being that the female … on perhaps even a biological level, believes she is inherently more worthy of life than her male counterpart. Female biology dictates to women that they should do whatever it takes to not find themselves fighting in the middle of a warzone, and if men, that cant handle being fashioned into trained killers, and being dropped back into society after murdering people reach their breaking point and start killing themselves off in record numbers that’s okay so long as women don’t have to.

As a result our society has furnished sex specific draft registration for men only.

A 2009 CBS study that gives the suicide rates per 100,000 veterans compared first to the general public, and then broken down by gender.

The results show that for 2005 and 2004 suicide records indicate that over double the rate of suicides occur In the veteran population , then in the general population and they cite this as evidence of an epidemic of suicide among the veteran population. But the fact that by gender, for both years three times the amount of male veterans committed suicide, than female veterans was not attributed to an epidemic of suicide amongst the male population. Why? Because if we give men a reprieve from the societal expectation that only they should have to carry the burden of war, who does that leave to pick up some of the slack? The gender that believes that they are inherently more entitled to live.



In regards to divorce and suicide we have the Marital status and suicide in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study Quoted as such:

“Divorced and separated persons were over twice as likely to commit suicide as married persons. Being single or widowed had no significant effect on suicide risk. When data were stratified by sex, it was observed that the risk of suicide among divorced men was over twice that of married men . Among women, however, there were no statistically significant differentials in the risk of suicide by marital status categories.”

The implications are of course that women are given the vast majority of wealth during divorce, when most of the times she put in minimal effort into the acquisition of it. Shes granted custody of the children 90% of the time as a means of facilitating this wealth transfer, and often times granted alimony payments which simply have no moral justification. Predictably male suicide spikes, after divorce, this isn’t exactly news, but what isn’t discussed is the deeper meaning behind these statistics. Society has furnished for these purposes an incredibly biased court system because they put more importance on the financial security of women, then the lives of the husbands that are driven to suicide from the effects of the divorce that women initiate in the majority.

We see this willingness to bail out women over and over in this society and to be frank im not going to cite evolutionary psychology as a cause, because to be quite honest I could give two shits about a highly speculative branch o psychology that places women as the justification for every ignored male hardship this misandric society manages to produce. And im not going to tell women to change either, what I am going to do is to tell men that they can drop out.

You're not the quality of woman you can attract with your bank account, you're not Saturday night at some ridiculous bar that you would never be at otherwise, you're not designed to live this way. Escape from society and along the way deprive it of every last damned male expectation it has of you.

Every possible interest you have that society attempts to ridicule due to its lack of ability to attract women, do it and enjoy it unapologetically, every dollar you earn, keep it spend it on yourself, not shoes not manipedi's not dinner or dancing or whatever other insufferable bullshit your supposed to learn to further your chances of getting laid. Game included. Do you and plan your escape. That’s what im doing… im using this society to garner an engineers education and then im doing everything possible to get the fuck out of dodge, and you, you can come with me… not literally of course but you can do the same. The marriage strike, the man up articles, they are simply a harbinger of things to come. We want out, men wan out. And when we do get out, don’t be surprised when a precipitous decline in mal suicide follows

1 million views

heres to 1 million more

Radfem calls porn "commercial rape industry"

The following is an excerpt from a radical feminist blog titled "rage against the man-chine" on a post titled "Porn Part 10: The Rutting Dogs of Capitalism"

"For those of you new to the site, I call the porn industry the “commercial rape industry” because the women in porn are paid for consent they would not otherwise furnish. If someone has to be paid to consent to something, they have not actually consented to it but have rather agreed not to make their non-consent an issue in exchange for money."

The author of course will neglect to mention that everybody who is currently gainfully employed is paid for their consent to services they wouldn’t otherwise furnish. The male worker drown working seventy hours a week is being paid to do things he simply does not wish to do in any capacity. He does so because he needs to pay his bills... this isn’t rape what it is, is a foreign concept to feminists known as money in exchange for labor, otherwise known as work, and women in porn are doing the exact same thing. They are 100% voluntarily providing access to their own bodies in exchange for money. Whether or not its degrading to women has as much to do with it as whether or not garbage collecting is degrading to a garbage man... its his job. Nobody put a gun to his head, he sought out that job and if he doesn’t do it, someone else will and not a single aspect of it could possibly be defined as rape at all.

For the record I don’t think that being a garbage collector is at all degrading especially when I personally know some of the garbage men in new work city and ive seen their houses and heir cars and believe me these men are certainly very happy with their work routine and I can comfortably make the assumption that not a single one of them considers themselves “raped” by their employers. Their is a demand for waste management, they meet that demand, they are paid well for doing so. Theres a demand for porn, women meet that demand voluntarily they are rewarded for it, and much more handsomely than their male counterparts I might add.

Women are the essential component to the porn industry, if you could somehow remove every pornographic image or video that included women, the porn industry would collapse, which is the very reason that women in porn are the highest paid employees in the industry. If anybody is to blame for a so called "degrading proliferation of internet porn" its women, since common sense dictates that the very existence of internet porn confirms the existence of a massive population of women that are willing to voluntarily engage in activities that these sanctimonious radical feminist parasites have deemed on the authority of their womens studies bigot licenses to be degrading to women.

Pointing this out is of course coming dangerously close to telling women to take responsibility for their own problems so instead it’s the patriarchy. It’s the patriarchy's fault that, a completely consenting adult wants to engage in a legalized contractual exchange of sex for money. There are invisible guns floating around women's heads, under the employ of the patriarchy, that only feminist can see that are forcing these women to meet the demands of the porn industry. Their desire for easy money has nothing to do with the proliferation of porn, nope it’s a worldwide male conspiracy…. that makes perfect sense to me.

Lets define for the purposes of sanity and honesty what a rape involving porn would actually consist of. If a woman decided that she wanted to do porn for money, and in the middle of doing so she demanded for it to stop... if her demands where ignored and the sex continued against her will, that would be rape. If she did not demand that it stopped that would be what you would call an exchange of cash for services rendered… and the attempt to extend the definition of rape in hopes of hiding the fact that the vast majority of men do not wish to and will never commit the crime of rape will be exposed every chance I get here on this channel.

It is a particularly vile and worthless type of human being to be so devoid of character, that she has to extract fabricated definitions of rape from a completely consensual exchange of sex just so her sad and hateful little life can have some meaning. This is the reason… feminists like her are the reason that the mens movement is growing everyday. She wants men to just sit there and agree with her fabricated lies, and her depictions of us as rapists and violent thugs, and she has, and continues to have the state, backing her up, and so feminists like her reached and reached until the lies became so odious, so patently false and violent in their nature that men, and even some women are taking notice, and we are intent on the systematic debunking of your their vicious passive aggressive, victimhood dependent ideology of violence and hatred against men.

Women surpassing men in - insert feminist talking point - ....

Im so tired of hearing women boast about how much better they're doing than men... Do you honestly believe that we aren't aware that the state has bent over backwards like a contortionist just that women could reach parity?.... Is it possible that women as a whole have not the intellectual honesty to admit to themselves that a massive figurative leg up has been extended to them?... one which is at the expense of men?


You simply don't understand your degree means nothing in terms of breakaway scientific achievement... There is male learning and there is female learning... Male learning is typified by it's independence of deadlines and curricula, no matter how much one attempts to trap it in ordered snippets of learning it follows it's own path, and is experimental. Einstein so eloquently put it by saying.

"i want to know Gods thoughts; the rest are just details"

Male learning is exploratory its conquistadorial if you will. Is conquistadorail a word? Is it found in the dictionary? I don't know and I don't care, because it has conveyed to you a characteristic of what I call male learning. It doesn't have to be in the dictionary, the purpose of words are if course to convey meaning, I took the my basic understanding of the English lexicon and instead of rigidly limiting my use of it to words found in a dictionary, I chose to add to it, since I am not bound by the English lexicon in my study of it, I can challenge it and add to it.

That is male Learning, we learn the basics of something and challenge it, until we arrive from already established knowledge to something that is unknown, and yes my example is a rather simplistic one, but this type of learning can be scaled up to challenge to the most enigmatic and obscure questions of science and discovery, men aren't afraid to learn and challenge theoretical physics either we simply aren't content to absorb knowledge, it won't suffice we. Must add to it

That is why men excel and women don't, because we don't like to be told that this scientific concept causes that scientific concept we have to know why, and when were provided with the established and accepted reasons for why one of us is bound to say to himself

Hold on this doesn't sound right
If the established reason for said phenomenon is a then why does b behave in such a way that so on and so forth yata yata and I present to you the next revolutionary scientific concept

Male learning to sum it up is taking things you know, and extrapolating to find something unknown.

And women listen and listen good

All the degrees in the world won't make you think this way, all of the help from affirmative action and women's only grants won't catalyze the spark of brilliance in your minds, if you want the privilege of thrusting yourself into the unknown and returning triumphantly with whatever your mind can grasp then you will have to earn it, you have to pay for a ride on that caravan and begging govt to tax men for you in hopes of decreasing your fare won't get you there you can't pay by crafting lax standards for women

you wont make the net great scientific discovery by getting straight A's and turning your assignment in on time, Einstein was a below average b student, and as result couldn't even find employment as a physicist or even a scientist of any sort, his best employment prospect was the swiss patent office, and it was there, where through sheer imaginative brilliance he thought up the theory of relativity, not in a classroom full of brain dead memorizers trained to regurgitate what the teacher wants you to say.

I myself make sure that before i take any college math or science course, i by the book ahead of time and teach it to myself, im not happy unless i taught it to myself and questioned it first, and more often than not what you discover is that even phd'd mathematicians and scientists teaching thee courses have incredibly inefficient and redundant ways of teaching, id rather learn myself locked up in a room with nothing but coffee time and pen and paper, and the fact is that most women would like to instead be told exactly how to solve a math problem step by step, without ever challenging or exploring the math, and until this changes women will simply not excel or even compare to men in regards to science..

Inevitably ill see a comment on this video... yknow a woman, implying that i just dont want to see omen do good in these Fields or some other nonsense. no to the contrary, i celebrate intelligence.. true inquisitive intelligence in women as much as i do men, i find intelligent capable women the anomalies that they are to be intriguing and interesting and even attractive, i enjoy coming across such women. probably due in part that so many other women are simply too lazy to put in the necessary work to learn.. not memorize but to learn. spare us this pitiful bragging about how your outperforming men. we all know the reason and your not fooling anyone.

Ah yes, i remember this..

The male and the female, a shining artifact of the past. What a powerful little dialogue here, a woman telling a man he should love himself!

Yet this my freinds is a cautionary tale, if you think that 99% of the entire female population ANYWHERE on earth, but particularly in the west are like this, you are sorely mistaken. And the propensity for men to beleive that there exists his own private angelic warm and sirenic soulmate, is the cuase of much male suffering. Too often men ridicule and laugh at the knight in shining armor fantasies that women dream up... this desire for a man to come and sweep them off their feet, ride them off into the sunset... the desire to be rescued forever and ever

We laugh at these fantasies becuase we know that this fictional ethereal male archtype that women seem to have dreamed up, is very unlike the actual male human being, and his wants and desires, we laugh becuase thier veiw of the ideal male is so dramatically opposite to the reality in terms of how the male mind operates, that we see it as nothing more than wishfull thinking from an irrational female mind, an infantile need for a second daddy.

Except what you just saw is the male version of this fantasy, an affectionate accepting madonna filling the male void with kind words and agenuine connection, satiating the deep-seeded mother-need that rests within most men. thats what ive decided to call it... male-mother-need.

It is the male condition being one that displays variance down to our very chromosomal makeup, in the form the XY, that has imprisoned us in a constant make or break existence. Societies, and civilizations have benefitted well from an almost boundless male deductive capacity... the ability to see the unseen, is a hallmark of the male, and civilization as we know it demands it in a cold mechanical sort of way, constantly testing the limits of the totality of its men, and exerting incredible pressurres until the next male provides that next critical insight, that ushers forth a wellspring of change.

This pressure, while benefitting the civilizational group as a whole, exerts an incredible amount of pressure on men as a totality... and they are viewed as a totality. The individual male, his hopes his thoughts and dreams are irrelevant in the eyes of a society which views him as just another potential insight rich vein in the giant watershed moment mining operation.

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." Friedrich Nietzsche

The individual male that doesnt understand societies required indifference to individual male desire, he may very well seek solace, in the fantasy that there exist... somewhere ... a kind, caring exceptionally warm woman that willl demand of him, only what he demands of her, simple companionship and affection. therein lies the danger, this is what motivates men like MJ or Kobe bryant to pair up with one woman in marriage and take great financial risk in doing so. for all of our incredible powers of logical reasoning, we cant logically conclude, that women never did like us... for us. such an epiphany, would thrust the individual male into a darkness that has for eons terrified him. he is alone. and unless he does something useful nobody will see any intrinsic value in him. This raking clawing threat is compounded many times over in men of wealth and status like Michael jordan, his wealth and fame, compounds the need for a genuine connection with a single, and in his mind incorruptible female. Icredibly wealthy and emotionally needy men are the holy grail of the predatory western parasite after all.

"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation and go to the grave with the song still in them." Henry david thoreau

thats what were so scared of, were scared of the possibility that were only wanted in this society because of all the things we do to sustain it, we have a creeping suspision that in the event that a society could somehow build and sustain itself without the contributions of men, that its only a matter of time before that society would seek to expel its men.

so i introduce the term male civilizationale draw: and define it as a force chaaracteristic to all civilizations exerted onto the totality of its men as though an industrial resource, for the betterment of the men women and children, in the civilation but at the expense of only men, which is designed to maximize male innovation.


Rather than honestly looking at what appears to be a reality in which the totality of females view the totality of men as an unfeeling and untiring renewable resource, to be drawn upon, we place our faith in the female, or rather the individual female, who would never think to use us. this is why we as men tend to magnify even the most trivial acts of kindness from women as being proof positive... or rather disproof positive of the overall trend of female usury in regards to men

is my assessment wrong, my prognosis to grim? too much of an exaggeration? you do know that the majority of homeless are men, why?... for all the reasons i just gave you, because if single mothers where the majority of homeless youd see a society up in arms

we all know that there are women having children they cannot pay for because they know that welfare, and wic and food-stamps will pay their way, its no secret, the question... is why are these programs put into place?... its simple, we care when women are out on the streets, but when men are out on the streets, its somehow their fault accross the board regardless of individual circumstances because of civilizational male draw.

this is no plea for sympathy, just a wake up call, you can choose to look for your own private little paradise on earth in the form of a woman that most likely doesn't exist, or you can start to exert pressure onto society by refusing to feed it, stop being scared that you might not ever find the right woman, and start being scared, and then angry that society is using you on multiple fronts without consent. never in history men had the opportunity to truly understand themselves, our ientity has always been strained through a female filter first and then offered up to us condensed in a solution of chivalry and misandry but this is what im offering all of the men listening to this, a chance to contribute to a shift in male thought and attitude whether women and society want it or not,, taking such a path, does not involve swearing off women, it merely involves accepting something about their nature that will for the rest of your life, render you incapable of viewing them in the form that society has drawn them. this is what male sovereignty is, hatred f women? dont flatter yourselves, weve been indifferent for a long time now..... the questions and the answers to them are now being framed in such a way that it can be devoid of any female input. and the question must now be formed shaped, and eventually answered by men. what path will men take going into the future? This is your next watershed moment men, except this one has the otential to free men for good. many men say that the objectives delineated here are impossible, that men are biologically incapable of rendering themselves free of the influence women and society have over them. i say its not only possible, but necessary. we discovered and split the atom we can do anything we please.

your vote counts for nothing... "vote or die" morons please jump off a cliff

The american political process is devoid of any real choice... What i mean to say is that your vote, despite your being fed a seemingly never ending directive telling you otherwise in the days leading up to any major american election, your vote counts for nothing. The most important component of any accurate tally is of course its verifiability, yet not a single american has any irrefutable proof that his or her vote is ever even counted.

We pull a lever, we leave and we expect elected officials and a media machine run for profit by corporate and political interests, to tell us if our politicians are still elected. Its utter foolishness... When people tell you to vote they are telling you to suspend reality plain and simple. Its convenient for the average american to assume that their vote is tangible and real and valuable, and so we see a mass acceptance of an un-certifiable election process because the illusion of choice must never be tampered with, if they american prole is to continue his own demise.

There are football games to be watched after all. But we the american people have no real way of verifying any conclusive election result, and what most likely is the case is that there is an inaccuracy, and even a complete falsification and ignorance of any electoral process at the expense of the american voter, as one heads further and further out from the intimacy of local governance.

To imply that there is in fact unknown and unseen entities that truly are in control of american politics, is to be branded a nutjob lunatic in america. It is of course a knee-jerk reaction for any disenfranchised civilization to attack those who point out the writing on the wall, no matter how clear and legible it is. But im not going to rattle off, some speech about the rockefellers or the jews or whatever, because none of that can be conclusively proven,

True power when wielded correctly is almost always invisible. Im going to simply state, that the situation is very clearly one in which a robust media machine is functioning as a vast feeler apparatus designed to tacitly gauge the general public consensus, via polling, and creating the illusion of objectivity by introducing a controversial issue, and debating only a limited set of viewpoints. Conversation framing if you want to call it that...

The media functioning as this feeler apparatus is then of course required to have an intimate knowledge of public consensus... when enough pressure is exerted by the public, the trajectory of the political body will reflect that, its not the true wishes of the people but a manageable facade of what the people think that they want and need from their political intelligentsia.

If a war is needed, then the stupid american proles will be groomed for war, they will be asked... but really told their opinions of whether or not a diplomatic or military solution to the problem in whereverstan is favorable, counting on the fact that they will never ask themselves whether either is necessary in the first place. the average american is so out of touch with reality that any behavior, absolutely anything can be introduced, debated normalized and accepted within a period of a decade.

The sad state of american manhood, has been reduced to the beer swilling sex crazed sports acolyte, through this very process. The effeminate self hating vegetarian male heterophobe, as well the pseudo-christian red-blooded evangelical war mongering right winger are prototypes of the same kind of operant conditioning. Not a single original thought between either of them exists, and in fact every american cultural archetype arose through this culture/perspective assembly line, we have no sovereign consciousness.

Its no surprise that our political process has been, taken over completely, not co-opted, but completely commandeered, so as to be rendered useless... So dont tell me to go vote, and dont tell me to vote or die, i dont give a shit about a fake political process, i dont give a shit about mitt romney or newt gingrich or obama, or taking precious time out of my day to go pull a lever in a booth to convince myself that i have any control. I guess that since americans generally are aware that they are getting fucked over by the state, they at least demand a lever to pull to make them feel special and important, its very romantic, but a futile childish gesture devoid of any political potency. The real possibility for change lies in the swaying of minds, and the changing of perspective, since this political system is one that eschews exactitudes, all that is needed for a change in divorce and child support law, is the appearance of enough resistance to it, so that the powers that be run the risk of showing openly that the wishes of the public can be ignored. this is the political future that men must confront, one of generalities, where perception and reality are synonymous with one another.

Single mom psychology, seeks the spousification of male sons

This is why the wire is a masterpiece. I consider it to be arguably the best show of all time, and it displays unapologetically the catastrophic consequence, that matriarchy exerts onto adolescent men. The video above depicts Delonda, and her son Namond discussing how Namond intends to provide for her... the mother, now that Namond's father has received a life sentence in prison.

The psychology of the single mother, a derivative of the female psychology in general, is on full display here and it highlights a very important process by which the single mother subjects her male children to a process of spousification, that places the adolescent male in the position of stand in husband, with all of the obligations and responsibilities that this implies.

This stems from the propensity for women to view children as resources, that are linked to provision from the father. In the event that the father is no longer able to produce wealth, the next best thing, granted the woman still seeks to procure financial stability are the sons of the father. Male children in matriarchal up-bringings where poverty is rampant become the de-facto breadwinners providers and protectors to the mother.

It's an extension of female thought patterns that view men through a filter of greed and usury, and the adolescent male in the single mother household, becomes both the husband and the possession of the single mother.

This compels the single mother to continue a process of emasculation of the adolescent male, that she feels she could never complete with his father, and since the mother being an adult, has full control over whatever resources are coming into the home via the everyman... foodstamps and welfare and other predominantly male funded govt subsidies, she can weild this desire to own and mentally castrate her own male child with complete power and impunity.

The adolescent boy being the progeny of his father will undoubtedly and specifically as he approaches manhood, take on both physical and other heritable qualities of his father and the single mom will actually build resentment to her son for this, furthering her efforts to emasculate, control, and spousify him.


All this of course creates a profound rift in the adolescent male's development and it can manifest in various ways in him, One being the adolescent male taking on the persona of hyper masculine bravado, a desperate mad dash to project as much Pseudo masculinity as possible, and i explain this further in my video titled deconstructing PUA fruads.

In this scenario the adolescent male develops an extreme distrust for other men, because he fears that any strong male figure will betray him in the same way that his father has. What isnt usually discussed is just how he feels that his father betrayed him, the generic supposition being that feelings of abandonment cause him to feel betrayed, but the part that hurts him the most is the fact that he feels that his father didn't rescue him, from the manipulations and attacks leveled against him by his own mother.

The passage of time provides the male youth with more independence and physical strength as well as a desire to challenge authority, the mother inevitably loses control and throws the rebellious son out onto the streets, populated by other males that are just as wayward and confused as himself, along with all of the unresolved male hostility and abandonment issues, and what results is violence.. lots of it


Are my claims nothing but psychological conjecture? maybe, but the fact remains that young adolescent males in single mother households are more likely to commit crime, and more likely to join gangs, that they describe as their family, and their brothers, and more likely to shoot and kill other men from other gangs, so we see amongst these adolescent males a need for brotherhood and male bonding, as well as a need to attack men which they perceive as being hostile. We need to start asking ourselves, to what degree is the absence of fathers causing this behavior as opposed to the degree that the presence of single mothers are causing it.

Thats right the presence of single mothers, lets start analyzing that for a change. lets start asking ourselves why, wherever we see single motherhood we see male on male violence, we see poverty, we see despair, why should we be handing out wick and food-stamps and welfare to single mother's when everything points to them being the problem and not the victims of it.

We see our society with all its talk about a war on poverty and urban renewal, and president obama blaming the fathers... on fathers day nonetheless, all in hopes of hiding the fact that single mothers are the ones in direct control of male youth in the matriarchal settings, they are the heads of these so called urban renewal projects, they are the ones raising these so called deadbeat fathers.

It is them that have held a generation of young men under siege, and our society loves to label them thugs and criminals an warehouse them in jail-cells like animals, but the truth is that single motherhood is the problem, not these men... these men would flourish, given the correct opportunities, but as long as single mothers are treated with empathy, sympathy and even praise our society, you can expect to be treated to the pleasure of higher crime and poverty rates, with no solution in sight.